Searching for Stars on an Island in Maine by Alan Lightman
My rating: 4 of 5 stars
I really enjoyed this book and the thoughts it sparked in me as I leafed through its passages. insightful and deeply moving reflection on the marvels of the material world—and the yearning that springs from the clear scientific materialist implication that, as Carl Sagan once remarked “The Cosmos is all that is, or ever was, or ever will be.” This realization that though we live in a brilliantly colorful world filled with life and dynamic possibility but one where there is ultimately nothing permeant, infinite, lasting or indivisible. Loved ones pass on, their bones molder in the ground to dust, our accomplishments fade into the sands of time like old Ozymandias, and even our seemingly eternally reliable celestial canopy will fade into cold, dark total chaos. Perhaps we can defy the second law of Thermodynamics; could we transform our consciousness into some sort of cloud whose sole purpose for existence is to maintain some concentrated being in the midst of total disorder (the theory of some transhumanists).
And yet we can still wonder at the beauty of our material world. Though the flower’s beauty quickly fades one can find great pleasure in the bloom though transient. Perhaps our existential anxiety can be assuaged as we witness incredible mechanics of a hummingbird in flight.
Two thoughts come to my mind as I gazed upon the stars and rocky coasts of Lute Island in Maine along with Dr. Lightman. First, though all we see and experience is transient, divisible, relative to fleeting contexts, human beings find ways to transcend our fractured, suffering, fluctuating, and sorrowful existence through finding unity, purpose, and hope. Even the most skeptical scientist (unless she is consigned to a philosophy of hopeless oxymoronic absolute relativism) will hold to the central doctrine of science, which is that the Universe is governed by laws, and that those laws are discoverable, and that they hold true everywhere and throughout all time. It is noted that all scientists also hold to the notion that there is a yet-to-be-discovered grand unifying theory of nature that ties all these laws into one circumscribed whole. This is of course not based on any materialist scientific conclusion but is a philosophical principle of faith. Nobody could ever prove with final absolute certainty any scientific law—notes Lightman, but that this desire to find transcendent absolutes in a fluctuating passing material world is based on the impulse of faith to discover and describe what might be just beyond one’s reach.
Lightman moves from cosmological to the biological origins of the natural world. It is true that the central doctrine of cosmology finds its corollary in the materialist naturalism that is the basis for the origin and evolution of life. Though some scientist asserts that there is no place for “God” or the “Supernatural” in their theory Lightman notes that the central doctrine itself is a transcendent principle of faith that can only be ‘proven’ true by completely transcending our fluctuating, fractured, fleeting existence.
The second thought that came to my mind was that just as there is beauty in the crooked, weathered timber of the coastal Maine forest, there is beauty and joy to be found amidst the suffering crooked timber of humanity. Loved one’s pass but we can have joy in their company and by sharing the burden of our coexistence within these material coils. So we can be reassured by these two thoughts: 1) though all experience refutes any notion of anything absolute, or even a concept of a non-materialistically determined free will, our experience in small transcendental moments also gives us hope and yearning that we do in fact think, feel, suffer, and exist in some eternal or lasting way; and 2) even though it is all simply an illusion, we can still revel in the warmth and light of that burning illusion while we can.
As a believer I find this view of science and the material world by a scientist to be welcoming, expansive, and filled with light.
View all my reviews
Beyond the Brow of the Hill
Tuesday, January 8, 2019
Review: The Kingdom of Speech
The Kingdom of Speech by Tom Wolfe
My rating: 4 of 5 stars
Wolfe magnificently pokes holes into the wet tissue-paper thin egos of the American Elite and this book takes to task academics who can be seen just as petty, ambitious, small, and irrational towards those who challenge their romantic perch upon the pinnacle on the power-levers of society. An entertaining read--at some parts perhaps it can oversimplify complex topics, but this critique of the gatekeepers of the Magisterium of Science is a nice addition to his other critiques of the Gnostic Magisteriums of Art (The Painted Word) and Architecture (From Bauhaus to Our House).
View all my reviews
My rating: 4 of 5 stars
Wolfe magnificently pokes holes into the wet tissue-paper thin egos of the American Elite and this book takes to task academics who can be seen just as petty, ambitious, small, and irrational towards those who challenge their romantic perch upon the pinnacle on the power-levers of society. An entertaining read--at some parts perhaps it can oversimplify complex topics, but this critique of the gatekeepers of the Magisterium of Science is a nice addition to his other critiques of the Gnostic Magisteriums of Art (The Painted Word) and Architecture (From Bauhaus to Our House).
View all my reviews
Review: Suicide of the West: How the Rebirth of Tribalism, Populism, Nationalism, and Identity Politics Is Destroying American Democracy
Suicide of the West: How the Rebirth of Tribalism, Populism, Nationalism, and Identity Politics Is Destroying American Democracy by Jonah Goldberg
My rating: 5 of 5 stars
Reading this book reminded me of Dostoevsky's quote from Notes from Underground: “I even think the best definition of man is: a being that goes on two legs and is ungrateful.”
Goldberg's main theme of this book is that there are a lot of things wrong with modern western democratic tradition, but that there is also nothing that has produced the blindingly rapid and expansive growth that mankind has seen in the past 300 (or even 100) years compared to the rest of human history and the rest of human civilization. Goldberg argues that this is not a predestined fate of humanity, and in fact that human nature does not lend itself easily to this kind of human flourishing. Instead the default state of nature/humankind is that of tribalism, family loyalty, adherence to strongmen/authority/hierarchy, violence as a primary means to one's desired ends, etc.
The book is pro-Enlightenment--ma non troppo. By that I mean that it looks at The Enlightenment favorably (especially the Scottish Enlightenment), but also has reservations (e.g., the French Enlightenment) that illustrate where human nature was misjudged and led to tyranny and human suffering. In this it is helpful to read this book after reading Steven Pinker's excellent Enlightenment Now to gain a more nuanced view of some of the weaknesses and excesses of the "Age of Reason". The end of the book explores the dual tyrannies that tap into the dark side of human nature: the tyranny of pleasure (pan et circenses or the Brave New World hypothesis) and the tyranny of pain (or the East German, soviet, Orwellian 1984 hypothesis). I find the combination of sex-lib movement and the intersectionality of power politics favoring the former hypothesis as the most convincing argument for the stifling of human freedom and flourishing in our modern society creating radical savage individuals incapable or exiled by their habit from community or any meaningful society. This partly explains the rise of tribal politics on both extremes of the political/social spectrum.
This review is only a short icepick take on my immediate thoughts upon reflection of the book, but it is also packed with other themes such as the competing myths of modern democratic foundation, the historical forces/personalities that propelled the American Founding and the birth of Capitalism, the aristocratic and romantic urge in human nature that is transferring at the intersectionality of politics to a pop culturalization of government, the 'deep state' and the place for technocrats in modern government and the danger they post. This book is a must read for any thinking person from any political persuasion in order to better understand the current dangers of our new politics--especially the dangers of tribalism.
View all my reviews
My rating: 5 of 5 stars
Reading this book reminded me of Dostoevsky's quote from Notes from Underground: “I even think the best definition of man is: a being that goes on two legs and is ungrateful.”
Goldberg's main theme of this book is that there are a lot of things wrong with modern western democratic tradition, but that there is also nothing that has produced the blindingly rapid and expansive growth that mankind has seen in the past 300 (or even 100) years compared to the rest of human history and the rest of human civilization. Goldberg argues that this is not a predestined fate of humanity, and in fact that human nature does not lend itself easily to this kind of human flourishing. Instead the default state of nature/humankind is that of tribalism, family loyalty, adherence to strongmen/authority/hierarchy, violence as a primary means to one's desired ends, etc.
The book is pro-Enlightenment--ma non troppo. By that I mean that it looks at The Enlightenment favorably (especially the Scottish Enlightenment), but also has reservations (e.g., the French Enlightenment) that illustrate where human nature was misjudged and led to tyranny and human suffering. In this it is helpful to read this book after reading Steven Pinker's excellent Enlightenment Now to gain a more nuanced view of some of the weaknesses and excesses of the "Age of Reason". The end of the book explores the dual tyrannies that tap into the dark side of human nature: the tyranny of pleasure (pan et circenses or the Brave New World hypothesis) and the tyranny of pain (or the East German, soviet, Orwellian 1984 hypothesis). I find the combination of sex-lib movement and the intersectionality of power politics favoring the former hypothesis as the most convincing argument for the stifling of human freedom and flourishing in our modern society creating radical savage individuals incapable or exiled by their habit from community or any meaningful society. This partly explains the rise of tribal politics on both extremes of the political/social spectrum.
This review is only a short icepick take on my immediate thoughts upon reflection of the book, but it is also packed with other themes such as the competing myths of modern democratic foundation, the historical forces/personalities that propelled the American Founding and the birth of Capitalism, the aristocratic and romantic urge in human nature that is transferring at the intersectionality of politics to a pop culturalization of government, the 'deep state' and the place for technocrats in modern government and the danger they post. This book is a must read for any thinking person from any political persuasion in order to better understand the current dangers of our new politics--especially the dangers of tribalism.
View all my reviews
Review: The Road to Character
The Road to Character by David Brooks
My rating: 4 of 5 stars
I was delighted to discover that this book is a Plutarch Lives variation on the theme of one of my favorite books: The Lonely Man of Faith written by Joseph Soloveitchik in 1965. In this book it was noted that there are two accounts of creation in Genesis and argued that these represent the two opposing sides of our nature:
1) Adam 1 or the career-oriented ambitious résumé adam who wants to build, create, dominate, conquer, produce, discover and control.
2) Adam 2 is the internal Adam who wants to have serene inner character, to know right and wrong, to be good, not just do good, to live according to obedience to transcendent truth.
This is also reflected in King Benjamin’s address to the people in the Book of Mormon when he says in Mosiah 3:19:
“For the natural man is an enemy to God, and has been from the fall of Adam, and will be, forever and ever, unless he yields to the enticings of the Holy Spirit, and putteth off the natural man and becometh a saint through the atonement of Christ the Lord, and becometh as a child, submissive, meek, humble, patient, full of love, willing to submit to all things which the Lord seeth fit to inflict upon him, even as a child doth submit to his father.”
David Brooks modernizes to the current cultural moment by dividing these two natures into two relatable virtues: the Résumé and Eulogy virtues. The résumé virtues are the ones that garner fame and prestige while the eulogy virtues garner a deeper relationship between people through personal connection, service, sharing of suffering and joy and common values.
Here are the contrasts I noted between the Natural, résumé Adam 1 and the covenant, eulogy, Adam II:
Adam 1 (Career Adam or Natural Man)
• Adam I wants to rise above and dominate nature
• Seeks to reach for the stars and overcome cosmic forces
• The authentic self is rooted in desires and appetites
• Hungers after adulation, praise, fame
• Filled with self-esteem, self-confidence
• Judges success by victories over other people
• Flaws, stumblings and imperfections are things I mock and deride in others. I am intolerant of other’s flaws
• Ultimate meaning comes from “making your mark on world”
• Compares everything to self
• Focuses on talents and not character
• Wants to venture forth
• Asks how things work
• Focused on reason and argument
• Motto: Success and happiness
• Outer majestic and Noble Adam
• Seeks to live a life of passion, and satisfaction of desire
• Seeks a life of self-expression or Self-actualization
• Lives by a straightforward utilitarian logic
• Practice makes perfect, Cultivate your strengths
• Lack the internal criteria to make unshakable commitments.
• Shrewd Animal
• Human relationships seen in economic terms: opportunity costs, scalability, human capital, cost-benefit analysis
• Private acts don’t affect public image
• Blooming virtues of smart young beautiful college students
• Seeks knowledge/information
• Focused on the Big accomplishments
• Sin is external
• Moral ‘Romantic’ The Golden figure and Culture of Authenticity—Culture of Identity or the Big Me
• Gospel of self-trust “Do what feels good”
• Sin doesn’t exist or is a barrier to fame and fortune
• Soul can be filled with ideologies and consumer products
• Distrust conventions, traditions, institutions outside self.
• We can know ourselves without help from others, God.
• It is easy to change ourselves to match our golden self since we only need to find it—it exists within us already.
Adam 2 (Covenant, Redeemed Man)
• Adam II wants to obey a calling to serve the world
• Renounces worldly status to serve a sacred purpose
• Mind, body, and spirit all serve one transcendent purpose
• Hungers for self-awareness, instruction, and self-assessment
• Filled with self-respect – has integrity to sacred covenants
• Judges success by victories over self, self-mastery
• It is okay to be flawed and stumble; you are no better than others, and therefore we tolerate each other’s flaws
• Ultimate meaning is external or extrinsic to oneself
• Knows everybody’s suffering is unique
• Focuses on inner moral drama and character over talents
• Wants to return to one’s roots, honor one’s parents, God
• Asks WHY things are, what is the meaning of life
• Focused on Faith
• Motto: Charity, Hope, Redemption
• Inner Humble Adam
• Seeks to live a life of purpose
• Seeks to serve/lift others to reach their moral potential
• Lives by a moral logic—do unto others.
• Weakness is a blessing Confront your weakness
• Failure leads to the greatest success, which is humility and learning and ultimately to redemption
• In order to fulfill yourself, you have to forget yourself
• In order to find yourself, you have to lose yourself
• Has a mind furnished by fixed principles and a core of iron to make unshakable personal commitments
“When was the last time you told the truth knowing it would hurt you?”
• Views Human relationships as eternal bonds upon which you are dependent for salvation and redemption
• Private acts carry public moral purposes
• Ripening virtues of Saints who lived a little, suffered, felt joy
• Seeks wisdom
• Focused on the smallest details and habits of life
• Sin is intrinsic to our nature and must be confronted
• Moral Realist—The Crooked Timber: “Out of the crooked timber of humanity, no straight thing was ever made.”
• Skeptical of appetites, passions, desires, represses n. urges
• Sin is universal and a barrier to inner peace
• Romans 7:18 For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh,) dwelleth no good thing: for to will is present with me; but how to perform that which is good I find not. “For the good that I would I do not: but the evil which I would not, that I do”
• Distrust self and trust tradition and outside social restraint
• Kahneman “We have an almost unlimited ability to ignore our own ignorance
• It is hard to build ourselves around fixed moral principles and requires 10,000 of daily small acts of kindness and reflection from other’s Conscience, Stand of Trees.
One of the Plutarch Lives presented in David Brooks treatise was Dorothy Day who served as a social activist and was a Catholic convert. Though I do not agree with much of her philosophical values I did like this quote:
“I try to think back; I try to remember this life that the Lord gave me; the other day I wrote down the words “a life remembered,” and I was going to try to make a summary for myself, write what mattered most— but I couldn’t do it. I just sat there and thought of our Lord, and His visit to us all those centuries ago, and I said to myself that my great luck was to have had Him on my mind for so long in my life!”
Along with the Adam 1 résumé virtues that David Brooks examined he also noted the effects that focus solely on these virtues can produce including postmodern Expressive Individualism. Some of these themes are also seen in other conservative writers and books such as Sen. Ben Sasse, Robert Putnam’s “Bowling Alone”, Charles Murray’s “Coming Apart”, JD Vance’s “Hillbilly Elegy” and others that note the breakdown of American communities
Among these, Brooks notes that:
1) Decades ago people told pollsters that they had four or five close friends whom they could tell everything. Today it is two or three, the number of people with NO confidants has doubled. Suicide has increased dramatically in the last 20 years.
2) 35% of older adults report being chronically lonely up from 20% in the year 2000.
3) Social Trust has declined: in 1960 significant majorities said people are generally trustworthy. In 1990 there Distrusters were in the majority by a 20 point margin.
4) People have become less empathetic: college students today score 40% lower than students in the 1970s in test of their ability to understand what another person is feeling. Most of that drop occurred after 2000.
5) Google showed usage of words like Character, Conscience, and Virtue in books, magazines, etc have dropped dramatically over the course of the 20th century
a. Bravery declined 66%, Gratitude is down 49%, Humility is down 52%, Kindness is down 56%
6) In the 1940s and 1950s psychologist asked more than 10,000 adolescents wheter they considered themselves to be a very important person, 12% said yes, in 1990 it was 80% of boys and 77% of girls.
7) Life Goal survey from 1976 showed that being famous ranked 15/16 for life goals. In 2007 it was in the top 3 for a majority.
8) In this ethos, sin is not found in your individual self; it is found in the external structures of society—in racism, inequality, and oppression. To improve yourself, you have to be taught to love yourself, to be true to yourself, not to doubt yourself and struggle against yourself. As one of the characters in one of the High School Musical movies sings, “The answers are all inside of me / All I’ve got to do is believe.”
The book ends on a very optimistic note, however, and presents a “Humility Code” that summarizes the virtues that were modeled by many of the lives of this book including Dwight Eisenhower’s virtue of self-conquest, the pseudonymous George Eliot’s (Mary Anne Evans was her true name) virtue of love, Augustine’s Ordered Love, and ending with Samual Johnson’s virtue of self-examination. For anybody interested in forming deeper connections with others and perhaps also with God, this book is a good place to start.
View all my reviews
My rating: 4 of 5 stars
I was delighted to discover that this book is a Plutarch Lives variation on the theme of one of my favorite books: The Lonely Man of Faith written by Joseph Soloveitchik in 1965. In this book it was noted that there are two accounts of creation in Genesis and argued that these represent the two opposing sides of our nature:
1) Adam 1 or the career-oriented ambitious résumé adam who wants to build, create, dominate, conquer, produce, discover and control.
2) Adam 2 is the internal Adam who wants to have serene inner character, to know right and wrong, to be good, not just do good, to live according to obedience to transcendent truth.
This is also reflected in King Benjamin’s address to the people in the Book of Mormon when he says in Mosiah 3:19:
“For the natural man is an enemy to God, and has been from the fall of Adam, and will be, forever and ever, unless he yields to the enticings of the Holy Spirit, and putteth off the natural man and becometh a saint through the atonement of Christ the Lord, and becometh as a child, submissive, meek, humble, patient, full of love, willing to submit to all things which the Lord seeth fit to inflict upon him, even as a child doth submit to his father.”
David Brooks modernizes to the current cultural moment by dividing these two natures into two relatable virtues: the Résumé and Eulogy virtues. The résumé virtues are the ones that garner fame and prestige while the eulogy virtues garner a deeper relationship between people through personal connection, service, sharing of suffering and joy and common values.
Here are the contrasts I noted between the Natural, résumé Adam 1 and the covenant, eulogy, Adam II:
Adam 1 (Career Adam or Natural Man)
• Adam I wants to rise above and dominate nature
• Seeks to reach for the stars and overcome cosmic forces
• The authentic self is rooted in desires and appetites
• Hungers after adulation, praise, fame
• Filled with self-esteem, self-confidence
• Judges success by victories over other people
• Flaws, stumblings and imperfections are things I mock and deride in others. I am intolerant of other’s flaws
• Ultimate meaning comes from “making your mark on world”
• Compares everything to self
• Focuses on talents and not character
• Wants to venture forth
• Asks how things work
• Focused on reason and argument
• Motto: Success and happiness
• Outer majestic and Noble Adam
• Seeks to live a life of passion, and satisfaction of desire
• Seeks a life of self-expression or Self-actualization
• Lives by a straightforward utilitarian logic
• Practice makes perfect, Cultivate your strengths
• Lack the internal criteria to make unshakable commitments.
• Shrewd Animal
• Human relationships seen in economic terms: opportunity costs, scalability, human capital, cost-benefit analysis
• Private acts don’t affect public image
• Blooming virtues of smart young beautiful college students
• Seeks knowledge/information
• Focused on the Big accomplishments
• Sin is external
• Moral ‘Romantic’ The Golden figure and Culture of Authenticity—Culture of Identity or the Big Me
• Gospel of self-trust “Do what feels good”
• Sin doesn’t exist or is a barrier to fame and fortune
• Soul can be filled with ideologies and consumer products
• Distrust conventions, traditions, institutions outside self.
• We can know ourselves without help from others, God.
• It is easy to change ourselves to match our golden self since we only need to find it—it exists within us already.
Adam 2 (Covenant, Redeemed Man)
• Adam II wants to obey a calling to serve the world
• Renounces worldly status to serve a sacred purpose
• Mind, body, and spirit all serve one transcendent purpose
• Hungers for self-awareness, instruction, and self-assessment
• Filled with self-respect – has integrity to sacred covenants
• Judges success by victories over self, self-mastery
• It is okay to be flawed and stumble; you are no better than others, and therefore we tolerate each other’s flaws
• Ultimate meaning is external or extrinsic to oneself
• Knows everybody’s suffering is unique
• Focuses on inner moral drama and character over talents
• Wants to return to one’s roots, honor one’s parents, God
• Asks WHY things are, what is the meaning of life
• Focused on Faith
• Motto: Charity, Hope, Redemption
• Inner Humble Adam
• Seeks to live a life of purpose
• Seeks to serve/lift others to reach their moral potential
• Lives by a moral logic—do unto others.
• Weakness is a blessing Confront your weakness
• Failure leads to the greatest success, which is humility and learning and ultimately to redemption
• In order to fulfill yourself, you have to forget yourself
• In order to find yourself, you have to lose yourself
• Has a mind furnished by fixed principles and a core of iron to make unshakable personal commitments
“When was the last time you told the truth knowing it would hurt you?”
• Views Human relationships as eternal bonds upon which you are dependent for salvation and redemption
• Private acts carry public moral purposes
• Ripening virtues of Saints who lived a little, suffered, felt joy
• Seeks wisdom
• Focused on the smallest details and habits of life
• Sin is intrinsic to our nature and must be confronted
• Moral Realist—The Crooked Timber: “Out of the crooked timber of humanity, no straight thing was ever made.”
• Skeptical of appetites, passions, desires, represses n. urges
• Sin is universal and a barrier to inner peace
• Romans 7:18 For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh,) dwelleth no good thing: for to will is present with me; but how to perform that which is good I find not. “For the good that I would I do not: but the evil which I would not, that I do”
• Distrust self and trust tradition and outside social restraint
• Kahneman “We have an almost unlimited ability to ignore our own ignorance
• It is hard to build ourselves around fixed moral principles and requires 10,000 of daily small acts of kindness and reflection from other’s Conscience, Stand of Trees.
One of the Plutarch Lives presented in David Brooks treatise was Dorothy Day who served as a social activist and was a Catholic convert. Though I do not agree with much of her philosophical values I did like this quote:
“I try to think back; I try to remember this life that the Lord gave me; the other day I wrote down the words “a life remembered,” and I was going to try to make a summary for myself, write what mattered most— but I couldn’t do it. I just sat there and thought of our Lord, and His visit to us all those centuries ago, and I said to myself that my great luck was to have had Him on my mind for so long in my life!”
Along with the Adam 1 résumé virtues that David Brooks examined he also noted the effects that focus solely on these virtues can produce including postmodern Expressive Individualism. Some of these themes are also seen in other conservative writers and books such as Sen. Ben Sasse, Robert Putnam’s “Bowling Alone”, Charles Murray’s “Coming Apart”, JD Vance’s “Hillbilly Elegy” and others that note the breakdown of American communities
Among these, Brooks notes that:
1) Decades ago people told pollsters that they had four or five close friends whom they could tell everything. Today it is two or three, the number of people with NO confidants has doubled. Suicide has increased dramatically in the last 20 years.
2) 35% of older adults report being chronically lonely up from 20% in the year 2000.
3) Social Trust has declined: in 1960 significant majorities said people are generally trustworthy. In 1990 there Distrusters were in the majority by a 20 point margin.
4) People have become less empathetic: college students today score 40% lower than students in the 1970s in test of their ability to understand what another person is feeling. Most of that drop occurred after 2000.
5) Google showed usage of words like Character, Conscience, and Virtue in books, magazines, etc have dropped dramatically over the course of the 20th century
a. Bravery declined 66%, Gratitude is down 49%, Humility is down 52%, Kindness is down 56%
6) In the 1940s and 1950s psychologist asked more than 10,000 adolescents wheter they considered themselves to be a very important person, 12% said yes, in 1990 it was 80% of boys and 77% of girls.
7) Life Goal survey from 1976 showed that being famous ranked 15/16 for life goals. In 2007 it was in the top 3 for a majority.
8) In this ethos, sin is not found in your individual self; it is found in the external structures of society—in racism, inequality, and oppression. To improve yourself, you have to be taught to love yourself, to be true to yourself, not to doubt yourself and struggle against yourself. As one of the characters in one of the High School Musical movies sings, “The answers are all inside of me / All I’ve got to do is believe.”
The book ends on a very optimistic note, however, and presents a “Humility Code” that summarizes the virtues that were modeled by many of the lives of this book including Dwight Eisenhower’s virtue of self-conquest, the pseudonymous George Eliot’s (Mary Anne Evans was her true name) virtue of love, Augustine’s Ordered Love, and ending with Samual Johnson’s virtue of self-examination. For anybody interested in forming deeper connections with others and perhaps also with God, this book is a good place to start.
View all my reviews
Review: Enlightenment Now: The Case for Reason, Science, Humanism, and Progress
Enlightenment Now: The Case for Reason, Science, Humanism, and Progress by Steven Pinker
My rating: 4 of 5 stars
A comprehensive Pro-enlightenment summary that pairs well with Jonah Goldberg's more sanguine take on the effects of modernity and the excesses of the French Enlightenment.
View all my reviews
My rating: 4 of 5 stars
A comprehensive Pro-enlightenment summary that pairs well with Jonah Goldberg's more sanguine take on the effects of modernity and the excesses of the French Enlightenment.
View all my reviews
Review: Chinaman's Chance
Chinaman's Chance by Ross Thomas
My rating: 5 of 5 stars
Great prose and layered crime plot that comes together very enjoyably in the end. All you have to do is read the hook in the first sentence and you too will be instantly mesmerized:
"The Pretender to the Emperor's Throne was a fat thirty-seven-year-old Chinaman named Artie Wu who always jogged along Malibu Beach right after dawn even in summer, when dawn came round as early as 4:42. It was while jogging along the beach just east of the Paradise Cove pier that he tripped over a dead pelican, fell, and meet the man with six greyhounds. It was the sixteenth of June, a Thursday.
View all my reviews
My rating: 5 of 5 stars
Great prose and layered crime plot that comes together very enjoyably in the end. All you have to do is read the hook in the first sentence and you too will be instantly mesmerized:
"The Pretender to the Emperor's Throne was a fat thirty-seven-year-old Chinaman named Artie Wu who always jogged along Malibu Beach right after dawn even in summer, when dawn came round as early as 4:42. It was while jogging along the beach just east of the Paradise Cove pier that he tripped over a dead pelican, fell, and meet the man with six greyhounds. It was the sixteenth of June, a Thursday.
View all my reviews
Review: Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness
Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness by Richard H. Thaler
My rating: 4 of 5 stars
Was mentioned in the ASA 2017 conference for anesthesiologist and I picked it up for the nights and flight back home. There are similar topics as Jonathon Haidt's mental elephant and turtle and Dan Kahnneman's thinking fast and slow. Some interesting points were made about effective choice architecture in retirement investments and health care.
View all my reviews
My rating: 4 of 5 stars
Was mentioned in the ASA 2017 conference for anesthesiologist and I picked it up for the nights and flight back home. There are similar topics as Jonathon Haidt's mental elephant and turtle and Dan Kahnneman's thinking fast and slow. Some interesting points were made about effective choice architecture in retirement investments and health care.
View all my reviews
Review: A Town Like Alice
A Town Like Alice by Nevil Shute
My rating: 4 of 5 stars
A beautiful book recommended by my beautiful wife that captures the rugged simple joys and vicissitudes of life in the outback of Australia in the 1950s. It tells of the romance between a Londoner and a Queenslander that was seeded during WW2 in a Japanese prison camp and blossomed there after. I read it while in Brisbane Australia thinking that apropos to my trip and also to learn more about my wife her family and her heritage.
View all my reviews
My rating: 4 of 5 stars
A beautiful book recommended by my beautiful wife that captures the rugged simple joys and vicissitudes of life in the outback of Australia in the 1950s. It tells of the romance between a Londoner and a Queenslander that was seeded during WW2 in a Japanese prison camp and blossomed there after. I read it while in Brisbane Australia thinking that apropos to my trip and also to learn more about my wife her family and her heritage.
View all my reviews
Book Review: Being Mortal by Atul Gawande
Being Mortal: Medicine and What Matters in the End by Atul Gawande
My rating: 5 of 5 stars
As an Anesthesiologist I am often confronted with salvage procedures and heroic measures that force me to wonder if there is no better way to care for those who are at the threshold passing mortality. The truest statement here in Atul Gawande's book is this: "Old age is not a battle. Old age is a massacre." We have become so accustomed to the radical, personal, and pervasive ways that technology has improved our daily lives that we expect Salvation from our technical tinkerers from Boston to San Francisco. This has blinded our modern society (especially modern medicine) to our limitations and more dangerously to the harm we do in our fevered pursuit of medical macguffins.
I noted with ironic melancholy the mission statement that was crafted by my Medical School class, which started thusly: "As Physicians we emerge like !SUPERMAN! from the phonebooth to save our patients from sickness. Like !SPIDERMAN! we gracefully swing in to the rescue of the sick."
My initial read of that was one of disgust. My first thought was, why not just surgically remove any semblance of humanistic sentiment from ourselves and raise ourselves out-of-reach in a superior pedestal as humanities savior? No, I thought, We need fewer superheroes in medicine and more frail Mother Teresas who know how to succor suffering and illness precisely because she draws from that deep well herself and not from the condescending super-patriarch -matriarch -noncisgenderiarch.
Instead of eliciting a patient's deepest hopes and understanding her foremost fears, we simply assign arbitrary value on our own prime directive: keep alive longer. In so doing we actually kill our patients sooner and with greater pain and suffering than the alternative: palliative care.
As Dr. Gawande notes the evidence from palliative care is incredible: people who have terminal illnesses e.g., terminal congestive heart failure, pulmonary disease, cancer malignancy, frail old age, etc., both live longer and higher quality lives than people who pursue medical treatment of their illnesses. All this at a significantly decreased cost! Indeed, if palliative care and geriatrics were a computerized device that one could implant into the human body then it would be quickly approved by the FDA and billions of dollars would be spent by Medicare implanting them into as many people as possible. Palliative care is so undercompensated that many major medical universities are unable to sustain a department -- all while medical sectors like plastic surgery and dermatology continue to remain the most popular, competitive, and well compensated fields of medicine.
Reading through Dr. Gawande's book I can't help but compare the current state of elderly care to the workhouses of Charles Dickens's Victorian society. While our society has made quantum leaps of progress in many areas of life, the care for the elderly remains often an unchanged dismal warehousing that it was years ago. Modern Medicine simply is cognitively unprepared to address the reality of our mortality.
One troubling moral minefield in this field of medicine, however, is how our values might sanctify or devalue human life. Where is the line between allowing a person to pursue their own values regarding not artificially prolonging their life and actively putting an end to their life? I can turn off a pacemaker of a patient who is 100% dependent on that pacemaker for cardiac function in accordance with their wishes not to have life-sustaining medical treatment. What is the difference between withdrawing treatment and giving a prescription that one knows will end a patient's life. My answer is that in the former we are adhering to the prime directive of medical ethics: FIrst do no harm--which argues for withdrawing or withholding medical treatments that would harm a patient's physical body or personal right to self-determination according to their values and ultimate meaning, and that the latter (to prescribe life-ending treatments) addresses the patient herself as the malady to be excised from existence. We can aggressively treat chronic pain and suffering that comes from extreme age, malignancy, disease, but the second we turn our medical expertise from treating the disease associated with a patient to treating the patient's existence as something to snuff out then we have crossed a line. Double-effect ethics are valid--we can treat pain and suffering that incidentally results in demise, but utilizing a patient's demise as the primary treatment modality for pain and suffering will lead to the dehumanization of the disabled and diseased. To move our focus from relieving pain and suffering of a patient by targeting the pain, suffering, and existential anxiety itself (in some cases) to removing the person who suffers divorces ourselves from the doctor-patient relationship and will inexorably lead to the dehumanization of our suffering patients.
View all my reviews
My rating: 5 of 5 stars
As an Anesthesiologist I am often confronted with salvage procedures and heroic measures that force me to wonder if there is no better way to care for those who are at the threshold passing mortality. The truest statement here in Atul Gawande's book is this: "Old age is not a battle. Old age is a massacre." We have become so accustomed to the radical, personal, and pervasive ways that technology has improved our daily lives that we expect Salvation from our technical tinkerers from Boston to San Francisco. This has blinded our modern society (especially modern medicine) to our limitations and more dangerously to the harm we do in our fevered pursuit of medical macguffins.
I noted with ironic melancholy the mission statement that was crafted by my Medical School class, which started thusly: "As Physicians we emerge like !SUPERMAN! from the phonebooth to save our patients from sickness. Like !SPIDERMAN! we gracefully swing in to the rescue of the sick."
My initial read of that was one of disgust. My first thought was, why not just surgically remove any semblance of humanistic sentiment from ourselves and raise ourselves out-of-reach in a superior pedestal as humanities savior? No, I thought, We need fewer superheroes in medicine and more frail Mother Teresas who know how to succor suffering and illness precisely because she draws from that deep well herself and not from the condescending super-patriarch -matriarch -noncisgenderiarch.
Instead of eliciting a patient's deepest hopes and understanding her foremost fears, we simply assign arbitrary value on our own prime directive: keep alive longer. In so doing we actually kill our patients sooner and with greater pain and suffering than the alternative: palliative care.
As Dr. Gawande notes the evidence from palliative care is incredible: people who have terminal illnesses e.g., terminal congestive heart failure, pulmonary disease, cancer malignancy, frail old age, etc., both live longer and higher quality lives than people who pursue medical treatment of their illnesses. All this at a significantly decreased cost! Indeed, if palliative care and geriatrics were a computerized device that one could implant into the human body then it would be quickly approved by the FDA and billions of dollars would be spent by Medicare implanting them into as many people as possible. Palliative care is so undercompensated that many major medical universities are unable to sustain a department -- all while medical sectors like plastic surgery and dermatology continue to remain the most popular, competitive, and well compensated fields of medicine.
Reading through Dr. Gawande's book I can't help but compare the current state of elderly care to the workhouses of Charles Dickens's Victorian society. While our society has made quantum leaps of progress in many areas of life, the care for the elderly remains often an unchanged dismal warehousing that it was years ago. Modern Medicine simply is cognitively unprepared to address the reality of our mortality.
One troubling moral minefield in this field of medicine, however, is how our values might sanctify or devalue human life. Where is the line between allowing a person to pursue their own values regarding not artificially prolonging their life and actively putting an end to their life? I can turn off a pacemaker of a patient who is 100% dependent on that pacemaker for cardiac function in accordance with their wishes not to have life-sustaining medical treatment. What is the difference between withdrawing treatment and giving a prescription that one knows will end a patient's life. My answer is that in the former we are adhering to the prime directive of medical ethics: FIrst do no harm--which argues for withdrawing or withholding medical treatments that would harm a patient's physical body or personal right to self-determination according to their values and ultimate meaning, and that the latter (to prescribe life-ending treatments) addresses the patient herself as the malady to be excised from existence. We can aggressively treat chronic pain and suffering that comes from extreme age, malignancy, disease, but the second we turn our medical expertise from treating the disease associated with a patient to treating the patient's existence as something to snuff out then we have crossed a line. Double-effect ethics are valid--we can treat pain and suffering that incidentally results in demise, but utilizing a patient's demise as the primary treatment modality for pain and suffering will lead to the dehumanization of the disabled and diseased. To move our focus from relieving pain and suffering of a patient by targeting the pain, suffering, and existential anxiety itself (in some cases) to removing the person who suffers divorces ourselves from the doctor-patient relationship and will inexorably lead to the dehumanization of our suffering patients.
View all my reviews
Sunday, November 6, 2016
Elders Quorum 1st Sunday Lesson
Lesson given in Elders Quorum on November 6th 2016
AGENCY AND RESPONSIBILITY
1. Understanding
Responsibility
·
Synonyms: __________________, __________________, __________________.
·
What article of faith talks about responsibility for our own actions?
·
What %?
·
Surveys show that
most people take credit for success for themselves, but blame failures on
external forces.
i. Why do people want choice but avoid responsibility? __________________.
·
What are some of
the things people say or do to try to avoid responsibility?
·
Famous excuses:
ii. Other excuses: __________________, __________________.
·
Excuses do not
correct mistakes. They do not = __________________.
·
What is the
difference between an excuse and a reason? __________________
2. The
power of Responsibility
·
Responsibility is
a willingness to confront fears, guilt and embarrassment
i. It is a willingness to see and accept
yourself as the one in control of your life, then to seize control of
the conditions that produce your success and happiness and allow dreams (faith
& hope) to be realized.
ii. Three traits necessary for high effectiveness:
1.
Confidence: Hebrews 10: 35-39, D&C 121: 45, 1 John 3: 18-22 (Cognitive Dissonance). Segue—Faith and Humility— Helaman 3: 35
2.
Humility: 2 Nephi 9: 42, Ether 12: 39 (Humility of Christ), Culture—People of Limhi (Mosiah 21)
vs. People of Alma (Mosiah 24),
Proverbs 18: 12
3.
Impulse Control: Mosiah 3:19
(Natural Man); Ether 12: 27, Jacob 4: 7,
Stanford and Rochester Marshmallow
Tests
iii. Power to turn
the other cheek & Forgive
iv. Power to seek
guidance
v. Power to confess
and repent
3. Being
Responsible / Taking control “If it is to be, It’s up to me.”
·
Assuming
responsibility increases our __________________ & __________________,
while blaming, making excuses, self-justifying, and self-pity limit our options
and control. If others are at fault and have to change before further progress
is made then others are in __________________ of the outcome or desired
results.
·
Agency and
responsibility are inseparable and interdependent principles—you cannot avoid
one without also __________________ the other.
·
“The Courageous man finds a way, the other
man finds an excuse.” Elder David B. Haight. (1 Nephi 3: 13-15 — Nephi vs. Laman & Lemuel).
·
“Acknowledging that you are responsible for
messing up your own life gives you the power to change things.” (How
Could You Do That: The Abdication of Character, Courage, and Conscience,
Dr. Laura Schlessinger)
4. Responsibility
and repentance—primary gifts & keys
·
Primary Gifts
of the Gospel—Agency & Responsibility
·
Primary Keys
of the Gospel—Remember (Faith) & Repent
i. Keys unlock the power
of the Gospel and open opportunities
for growth.
“Next to the bestowal of life itself, the right to direct that life is
God’s greatest gift to man. … Freedom of choice is more to be treasured than
any possession earth can give” (David O. McKay; in Conference Report, Apr.
1950, p. 32).
i. Justice requires that we take 100% responsibility.
1.
Does the
atonement absolve us of responsibility for our sins? __________________.
2.
Is this
absolution free/unconditional/automatic? __________________.
3.
What is our
responsibility? __________________.
ii. Mercy allows us the opportunity to progress by
providing us a mechanism to correct mistakes and address weaknesses.
iii. Faith is the dynamic driving force of recognition,
correction, and progression. Avoid obvious, large sins through obedience and
correct small sins/transgressions through repentance.
“In order to have
success, you must increase your failure rate.” – Thomas Watson, Founder of IBM
·
Faith requires
that our desire for success is greater than our fear
of failure—never let fear dominate our decisions or actions. (Life
Choices—Anxiety and confidence).
·
What is the first
step in the repentance process? __________________
·
What does
responsibility have to do with this first step? __________________
·
Is spiritual
growth possible without recognizing sin in our life? __________________
“The greatest of all
faults is to be conscious of none. – Thomas Carlyle, quoted in The Miracle
of Forgiveness Ch. 3
·
What does the
Gift of Confession have to do with 100% responsibility? __________________
The Anti-Christ Doctrine: men are not responsible for their own actions.
2 Nephi 28: 8-9– “justify us in committing a little sin; yea, lie a little…”
D&C 93: 39 – 2 ways of the adversary: 1) Disobedience, 2) Cultural Tradition
5. JUSTIFICATION
·
Self – Justification
Trying to pay the law
of Justice with an excuse (rationalization)
Trying to become our
own savior with an excuse
“The Enemy of Repentance is self-justification” Spencer W. Kimball
Justification: to
receive a remission of sins and be declared free of the responsibility of sin.
Man becomes justified
through the grace of the Savior as a result of faith exercised in Him. That
faith is demonstrated through repentance and obedience to the commandments and
ordinances of the gospel. The atonement of Jesus Christ makes repentance and
justification possible for all mankind. Thus justified, he is forgiven the
consequences that he would otherwise receive.
If we take 100%
responsibility, the Savior with pay for our sins.
·
When we excuse,
procrastinate, hide, or blame our sins on outside forces, what are we denying?
(Alma 42: 30). __________________
When we
aren’t responsible to God, we lose control to Satan
6.
How does our father in heaven feel about personal
responsibilty?
________________________________________________________________________
vs.
|
||
vs.
|
||
vs.
|
||
vs.
|
·
What about those
who are lukewarm? __________________
·
What about those
who are not lazy and say they have a willing heart, but are too busy, or they
don’t have the time? Where are they in the spectrum? __________________
7.
Responsibility for / to others (Am I
my brother’s keeper?)
Love our Spouse and
Family:
·
It is a
commandment: “Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself,” [Matt. 22:37, 39].
This is a command that requires a decision.
·
“Ye will teach
them [your children] to love one another, and to serve one another” (Mosiah 4:15).
How can something be taught that cannot be learned? __________________
·
Command to love
our spouse: “Thou shalt love thy wife with all thy heart, and shalt cleave unto
her and none else” (D&C 42:22).
·
“A new commandment
I give unto you, That ye love one another; as I have loved you, that
ye also love one another” (John 13:34;
emphasis added). Loving as He loved is a higher form of love than loving “as
thyself.” It is a pure love that puts another higher than self.
·
This pure love is
the same love that should exist between husbands and wives. In Ephesians. 5:25,
the Apostle Paul exhorts, “Husbands, love your wives, [How?] even
as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it.” How, then, did
Christ love the Church? __________________
Acknowledgement: Parts of this lesson owe much of their material that was derived from articles, and talks given by Stephen Covey and Elder Lynn G. Robbins.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)